Second
appeal for Action: Tarrant México - Ajalpan Send
your protest e-mail now! Update: Legal recognition independent
union denied, workers still without jobs Dear
friends, Please find below an update of the ongoing conflict regarding violations
of the right to organize at the U.S.-owned Tarrant México - Ajalpan factory,
which produces for such brands as Tommy Hilfiger, The Wet Seal and Limited. After
workers at the factory took action to demand improved working conditions, management
fired hundreds of workers, including most of the leaders of the newly formed independent
union. Now, this union is unjustly denied a legal status by the Mexican board.
The Mexican-based CAT (Centro de Apoyo al Trabajador; workers organizing centre),
supports the workers and has requested international help. This aid is especially
needed since the reinstallation hearings for the dismissed workers are set for
October 15th and 23rd, and they cannot be represented by their union. Please increase
the pressure on Tarrant clients, Tarrant management and the local government to
make them ensure that workers' rights are respected. Contact information, as well
as a sample letter, is included below. Please send your letters of concern today.
Many thanks in advance.
CASE
UPDATE (Source: CAT) On October 6th, the Local Conciliation and Arbitration
Board of Puebla (JLCA) denied legal registration (registro) to the Only Independent
Union of Tarrant México Company Workers (SUITTAR). The three arguments
given for denying the workers' petition for registro were: The original
copy of the petition plus one photocopy were provided, when Mexican Federal Labor
Law (LFT), Article 365 states that the original must be filed with "duplicate"
copies. This reason for denial is a violation of the JLCA's legal responsibility
to revise all submitted documents and notify the petitioners what is lacking before
considering their petition, as is stipulated in LFT Articles 685 and 686. The
JLCA never informed the workers or gave them an opportunity to correct their petition
as it should have done when the documents were submitted, and instead proceeded
directly to resolve and process the denial. The date that the independent
union was formed was the same as the date of the election of its executive committee
representatives. The JLCA says these two events should have occurred on separate
days. Of the approximately 750 affiliated workers listed in SUITTAR's
registro petition, the name of one of the representatives of the executive committee
(María Guadalupe Martínez Gonzáles) does not correspond with
a name on the union's list of affiliates (Maura Guadalupe Martínez Gonzáles).
Again, the JCLA should have let SUITTAR know that some things weren't completely
clear. Especially since it is obscure where it is stated that the forming of a
union and elections of representatives cannot happen on the same day.
SUITTAR
and its legal counsel will be appealing the registro decision and taking other
action to pressure the government and the company to respect their legal rights
to union freedom according to Articles 6, 9 and 123 of the Mexican Constitution,
Articles 133 and 354-385 of Mexican Federal Labor Law (LFT) and Conventions 11,
87, 135 and 141 of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). As part of its
legal and political strategy to overturn the registro decision and come to a collective
bargaining agreement, SUITTAR and its legal counsel will appeal the decision,
a well-known Mexican labor lawyer will write an independent legal opinion of the
decision and SUITTAR will pursue legal submissions before the National Administrative
Offices of the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAO/NAALC), the
ILO and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). It is
important to point out that the appeal could take six to eight months to be resolved,
during which time it is essential for the local and international allies to continue
using several legal and political tactics to pressure the government and companies.
Further information on legal developments and strategy will be forthcoming. The
main campaign targets are now The Wet Seal, Federated Department Stores
and Tommy Hilfiger because all three are important TAG clients at the international
level. Levi Strauss has agreed to and followed through on many of the workers'
demands , including personally contacting many of TAG's clients to inform them
that the brand was denied access to monitor its Code of Conduct and that the factory
ultimately decided to sever its business ties with Levi's. The
Wet Seal Despite initial conversations, The Wet Seal has not yet indicated
what, if anything, it is willing to do regarding the Ajalpan situation and the
Code of Conduct and legal violations. And while Federated has responded to initial
requests for intervention, its responses have been unsatisfactory. Federated will
not "get involved" in "labor disputes" nor in factories where
it does not currently produce a product, it does not "expect to do anything"
about the Ajalpan situation in the future, and it has made it quite clear that
its Code of Conduct does not include the right to freedom of association. Tommy
Hilfiger Tommy Hilfiger appears to have removed its production from the
factory, reportedly for "business reasons", and is refusing to respond
to petitions to enforce its Code of Conduct. Therefore we call on all of our
local and international allies to focus pressure on these three brands until they
force Tarrant and the state and federal governments to uphold the brands' Codes
of Conduct and respect Mexican and international law. CALL
FOR ACTION We would at this stage like to ask you to focus pressure
on Tarrant Apparel Group's (TAG) major international clients - to force the factory
to obey the law and the brands' Codes of Conduct - while copying this communication
to the company and the federal and state governments. That way we can hopefully
come closer to achieving the overall goal of signing a collective bargaining agreement
between the workers' union of choice and the factory. - Please contact
The Wet Seal, Federated Department Stores and Tommy Hilfiger directly and
send copies of your communication to the secondary targets given below. Insist
that they:
Contact TAG, the Mexican federal government and the Puebla state
government to ensure that: a. The Ajalpan workers' rights
to freedom of association are upheld, thus accepting SUITTAR's appeal, overturning
the registro decision and legally recognizing the independent union. The JLCA
violated LFT (Mexican Federal Law) Articles 685 and 686 stipulating its responsibility
to revise all submitted documents and notify the petitioners what is lacking before
considering the registro petition. b. The company shows up to the
reinstallation hearings on October 15th and 23rd and that the illegally-fired
workers are reinstated, according to LFT Chapter IV. c. The company
signs a collective bargaining agreement with SUITTAR according to LFT Articles
386 and 439.
- Work together with Levi's, Limited
Brands, Charming Shoppes and other TAG clients to urge TAG and the Puebla state
government to comply with the brands' Codes of Conduct and Mexican law.
- Publicly
cite the Worker
Rights Consortium report as evidence of the illegal violations.
- Communicate
directly with the workers and the CAT, for instance via catpuebla@yahoo.com.mx.
Send
these companies our sample letter directly! THE
WET SEAL, INC - Send
now! Peter Whitford, CEO Office: 26972 Burbank, Foothill Ranch,
CA, USA 92610 Phone: (800) 735-7325 Fax: (949) 699-4046 E-mail: peter.whitford@wetseal.com FEDERATED
DEPARTMENT STORES, INC - Send
Now! James Zimmerman, Chairman of the Board Office: 7 West Seventh
Street, Cincinnati, OH, USA 45202 Phone: (513) 579-7000 Fax: (212) 494-1838 E-mail:
jzimmerman@fds.com TOMMY HILFIGER CORPORATION - Send
Now! Dave Dyer, Company President and CEO Joel Horowitz, Chairman
of the Board Tommy Hilfiger, Honorary Chairman of the Board and Principal Designer Office:
9/F Novel Industrial Building, 850-870 Lai Chi Kok Rd., Cheung Sha Wan, Kowloon,
Hong Kong Phone: 852-2216-0668 (Hong Kong), 852-274-7798 (Hong Kong), (212)
840-8888 (New York) Fax: 852-2312-1368 (Hong Kong), 852-2371-2928 (Hong Kong),
(212) 548-1965 (New York) E-mail: ddyer@tommy-usa.com, jhorowitz@tommy-usa.com,
thilfiger@tommy-usa.com Code of Conduct Department: cbirchfield@tommyhilfiger.com
SAMPLE
LETTER Please adapt and send the following letter: Dear
[insert name of company representative], I have recently received updated information
regarding the illegal dismissals of hundreds of workers from the Tarrant México
- Ajalpan factory in Puebla, as well as reports that workers at this facility
are being prevented from exercising their legal right to free association. Specifically,
the independent union SUITTAR was on October 6th unjustly denied legal recognition. The
company's and labour board's actions against the workers, and the leadership of
the union, violate Mexican labour laws (the right to organize), as well as fundamental
workers' rights and constitute a human rights violation. Workers at Tarrant are
entitled to be represented by the union of their choosing, without intimidation
or discrimination. I therefore fully support the workers in this matter.
I urge you to take responsibility and: - Immediately contact Tarrant
management, the Mexican federal government and the Puebla state government to
ensure that:
a. The Ajalpan workers' rights to freedom of association
are upheld, thus accepting SUITTAR's appeal, overturning the registro decision
and legally recognizing the independent union. The JLCA violated LFT (Mexican
Federal Law) Articles 685 and 686 stipulating its responsibility to revise all
submitted documents and notify the petitioners what is lacking before considering
the registro petition. b. The company shows up to the reinstallation hearings
on October 15th and 23rd and that the illegally-fired workers are reinstalled,
according to LFT Chapter IV. c. The company signs a collective bargaining
agreement with SUITTAR according to LFT Articles 386 and 439.
- Work
together with Levi's, Limited Brands, Charming Shoppes and other TAG clients to
urge TAG and the Puebla state government to comply with the brands' Codes of Conduct
and Mexican and international law.
- Publicly cite the Worker Rights Consortium
report as evidence of the illegal violations, see www.workersrights.org.
- Communicate
directly with the workers and the CAT, for instance via catpuebla@yahoo.com.mx.
For
your information, I am also contacting the factory's management, the governor
and JLCA of Puebla to share my concerns with them. Thank you for your consideration.
I appreciate your prompt attention and action, and hope that you will take the
necessary steps to bring about a resolution to this matter that is to the satisfaction
of the workers and in compliance with the law. Sincerely, [insert
name/organization here]
2. Please
copy the following secondary targets in the Cc: |