More
info on this case
April 26, 2001, Response from adidas to our protest
letters on the Panarub case
Message from Adidas (April 26, 2001)
Dear All,
We have received e mails from some of you regarding the arrest
of Ngadinah. We are concerned and are continuing to follow this
matter closely. In the meantime we would like to communicate the
present poistion in the attached statement to you.
best regards
David Husselbee
Statement: PT Panarub, Indonesia.
The adidas-Salomon Standards of Engagement ("SOE") clearly
set out the
terms and conditions on which we are prepared to do business with
manufacturers and other partners. The SOE Team has been working
together
with our manufacturing partners on programmes of continuous improvement
throughout the footwear factories of our suppliers in Asia. In particular,
the implementation of the SOE at PT Panarub factory in Indonesia
has been
consistent and genuine. We consider PT Panarub to be a leading SOE
factory
in the region.
During the last 12 months, there have been frequent demonstrations
and
strikes in factories in different industries in Indonesia, so our
SOE Team
has felt it important to maintain a strong focus on:
§ support for the Right of Association standard under the SOE
and freedom
of association according to the laws of Indonesia;
§ management-worker communication systems;
§ development of, and interaction with, unions under local
law, including
training of union members in health & safety and labour issues.
The factories in Indonesia have been working hard on these issues,
but we
recognise that there are still some gaps in their management approach.
PT
Panarub currently has 2 unions which have been allowed to carry
out all
lawful activities. The factory is one of the first to have an alternative
union, and management has been working hard to balance the interests
of
both unions taking into account their memberships. So it would be
inaccurate to characterise factory as one which has suppressed the
activities of new unions
Last September, a series of demonstrations were held in PT Panarub
factory
and the local area. Many employees of the factory were prevented
from
getting to work by their normal mode of transport, usually mini
bus, and a
large number of employees already on the factory grounds were strongly
encouraged to join the demonstrations. At that time, there was some
concern
that factory employees had been intimidated by those who lead the
demonstrations, and that there had been a series of unlawful acts
endangering people's safety and property. Consequently, over the
last 6
months, the local police have been conducting their own investigations.
As
a result, on 23 April 2001, they detained one of the factory employees,
Ngadinah Binti Abu Mawardi.
Before her detention, Ms Ngadinah continued to work in the factory
and
continued in her position as Secretary of Perbupas, the alternative
union
in the factory. No employees were dismissed as a result of the
participation in the demonstrations. Nor was any action taken by
the
factory against any of the participants, regardless of their union
status,
as set out in the agreement witnessed by the Manpower Department
following
the demonstrations last September. It has come as some surprise
then that
Ms Ngadinah was detained.
adidas-Salomon deeply regrets that she has been singled out for
detention
and prosecution and it is our hope that she is released. However,
given
that she is the subject of a criminal legal proceedings being dealt
with by
the local public prosecutor, her release is not within the control
of
adidas-Salomon or PT Panarub.
adidas-Salomon will continue to investigate this matter and follow
the case
closely. We will continue also working with the factory to ensure
that the
Right of Association standard is honoured. Recently, our own efforts
in
this area have resulted in improvements to our standard which will
help our
partners to better understand their obligations. The revised standard
now
reads:
Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining: Business partners
must
recognise and respect the right of employees to join and organise
associations of their own choosing and to bargain collectively.
Where law
specifically restricts the right to freedom of association and collective
bargaining, business partners must not obstruct alternative and
legal means
for independent and free association or collective bargaining.
Additionally, business partners must implement systems to ensure
good
communication with employees.
adidas-Salomon AG
26.04.01.
|