|
(More
on this case) ( !! Note that Kukdong changed it's name sept
2001 to Mex Mode )
Feb 2, 2001 - Update at Kuk Dong: 70 Workers Not
Allowed to Return to their Jobs
Dear Friends, Information continues to come in regarding the
case of Kuk Dong in Mexico. Yesterday we received reports that
some of the five workers who were originally fired in early January
for their leadership in the struggle for an independent union
at the Kuk Dong factory in Atlixco de Puebla, Mexico planned to
attempt to return to work this week
so far no news on this, but we will keep you informed.
Nikes and Kuk Dongs Scorched Earth Campaign
Moving Forward Rapidly
United Students Against Sweatshops has received credible reports
from our representatives in Mexico that on Tuesday, February 6 around
70 workers who attempted to return to work at the Kuk Dong factory
the site of a month- long struggle in Atlixco de Puebla,
Mexico were illegally forced to sign their affiliation to
the illegitimate company protection union, the FROC CROC and then
told by Kuk Dong officials (Snr. Hugo de La Peña and the
secretary of Human Resources, Rocio) that they they were not needed
and could not enter. Rather, management would get back to them days
later after reviewing their files, since "nobody could be trusted,"
and that the company would only hire those workers that were convenient."
All of this happened while an accredited monitor for the Fair Labor
Association, Verite, was present at the plant allegedly to
insure that all workers who have participated in the strike at Kuk
Dong were immediately allowed back to work. Kuk Dong management
has twice agreed in front of local labor officials and independent
observers to rehire all of the workers fired during the month-long
struggle at their plant. This result has been publicly guaranteed
by Nike.
Workers understood Tuesdays events as they were intended
- a dissuasive measure and a message that no matter what, they would
never be allowed back to their jobs, despite the repeated agreements,
the international pressure, the monitors. Only about 400 of the
original 850+ workers are back working at Kuk Dong at this moment,
and many have already been forced to find jobs elsewhere since they
cannot afford another week without being allowed back in.
At this point, because of violations and delays in ensuring freedom
of association, Nike has essentially denied the workers this right
and outright refused to enforce its code of conduct. No action that
Nike takes will be sufficient to repair what is probably already
irreparable damage. Nike is fully participating in a scorched
earth strategy. They are standing by, continuing to research
and refusing to act while serious violations of freedom of association
continue, workers are forced to find other work, and consequently
those who originally supported the union are fired de facto, weakening
the organizing effort and the freedom of the workforce to choose
their own representatives. Nike is not just a buyer in the wrong
place at the wrong time; rather, it is a fully complicit participant
in a strategy to undermine workers right to organize.
When five workers were originally fired at the factory, Nike stood
by and did nothing. When police attacked the subsequent worker occupation
of the factory grounds, sending 15 people to the hospital, Nike
stood by and did nothing. When Kuk Dong management illegally fired
or forced the resignation of more than 200 more workers the following
week, Nike stood by and did nothing. It said it had an independent
mediator studying the issue, and that it would not act until he
found the facts.
And indeed, Nikes own independent mediator, Arturo Alcalde,
came out with a study last week that confirmed not only the independent
investigation of the Worker Rights Consortium but also the ongoing
reports of USAS, SEREAL (a human rights group in Puebla), US/LEAP,
Maquiladora Solidarity Network, Global Exchange, and other allies
that serious violations of workers legitimate rights
to freedom of association have occurred at Kuk Dong. This result
was confirmed again by Nikes own compliance officer. But because
Nike was not satisfied with the reports of its own commissioned
mediator, its own employee, and the WRC, it again said more investigation
was required. So, it has commissioned the support of the Fair Labor
Association, whose findings it says it will take very seriously.
Nike says it will update the public by February 15 with its intended
response indeed, the scorched earth strategy is going forward.
Within two days, separate reports by the WRC and Nikes mediator
called for the same things:
- All Kuk Dong workers employed before the strike should be rehired
immediately and without any exception.
- There should not be any use of discrimination in the process
of rehiring against any worker for their support of an independent
union.
- All illegal charges should be dropped against the leaders of
the independent unionization effort.
The International Labor Rights Fund, who also participated in drafting
the report, said it best: We believe that the crisis at the
Kukdong factory can be resolved if action is taken swiftly to re-employ
all the workers who were on strike
. When it comes to union
representation, justice delayed is justice denied.
Yet Nike has delayed, delayed, and delayed at every turn. Justice
is being denied at Kuk Dong, and since the FLA has been involved,
other violations of worker rights have continued to mount; yet Nike,
conveniently hiding behind another investigation, has chosen not
to act:
-Workers returning to the factory are being forced to sign documents
changing their status to new employees, which means that their previous
salaries, positions and seniority are revoked. This is a clear violation
of Kukdong's legally binding agreement to allow workers to return
under the terms of their previous employment.
-Workers returning to the factory are illegally being forced to
sign statements of support for the CROC. The requirement under Mexican
law for workers to sign statements of support for the union when
entering the factory that Nike cited in its letter to university
presidents last week is only for new workers, not workers returning
for a strike. Hence, the very requirement of signing statements
of support is not only a form of intimidation, but it is a violation
that builds on the above point, that workers who supported the strike
are being discriminated against in terms of their employment status.
Furthermore, the report of Nikes independent mediator questioned
the very legality of the FROC CROCs contract with Kuk Dong,
detailing that the CROC contract was signed "before labor began
at the plant" and that the contract has a "fundamental
deficiency that invalidates it" by not having an incorporated
salary schedule. Thus the entire premise of the legality of the
company union and its contract with Kuk Dong is false and any requirement
that Kuk Dong workers become members of the CROC is invalid. Yet
Nike has allied itself with the FROC CROC by insisting that under
Mexican law, workers must sign statements of support for the company
union before getting their jobs back.
-Charges are not being dropped against the leaders of the independent
organizing effort. Instead, the reign of terror continues at Kuk
Dong. An article published last week in Reforma, a major Mexico
City paper, states that arrest warrants are still pending for the
leaders of the strike. It is important to understand that Mexico
has been cited by Amnesty International for the common use of torture
by police this is what arrests would mean for the leaders.
-Kukdong management has isolated workers who it believes are leaders
of the independent union effort to actively discourage organizing
among workers in the factory.
-Kuk Dong is sending company security guards and leaders of the
FROC-CROC out to the villages to promote workers coming back to
Kuk Dong. When management agreed to reinstate all workers, they
agreed to participate in an outreach program to let all workers
in the surrounding pueblas know that they are welcome back to the
factory without reprisal. This current development is a far cry
from a welcoming appeal.
Furthermore, it has been reported that the company has hired at
least several dozen new employees in the past week. A likely strategy
to dissipate support for the activities of the workers is for the
company to bring in new hires who are already allied with the FROC
CROC.
Nine days ago, USAS sent a letter to Nike saying that, among other
criteria, the following demands had to be met by Friday, February
2 at Kuk Dong for freedom of association to truly be resepected.
Furthermore, the letter read that Any further delay by Nike
in meeting these demands clearly constitutes provocation and will
lead to an escalation of protests against Nike and those university
administrators who are complicit in Nikes failure to enforce
the codes of conduct.
(1) Nike must oversee the immediate reinstatement of all workers
who have been fired or coerced into signing resignation forms.
(2) Nike must ensure that no further punitive measures can be
taken against any worker or supporter who participated in the strike
and that all charges are dropped against workers and their supporters
in the strike and related protests.
(3) The Kuk Dong factory must be absolutely free of any intimidation
toward the workers; therefore, Nike must work with local organizations
to maintain a third party presence at the factory to monitor the
working situation until the workers have secured a union which represents
their voices.
Based on the above reports, Nike and the FLA have been complicit
in ensuring that freedom of association is denied at Kuk Dong, violating
all three of the above demands. It is only the most recent of a
months worth of provocations.
In addition, over the past two weeks a series of university presidents
have written letters to Nike expressing their concern over the violation
of freedom of association at Kuk Dong. They made clear that they
expected their codes of conduct to be enforced by the immediate
rehiring of all of the workers free of any intimidation and a guarantee
of a climate allowing for the workers to freely choose their union
representatives. Most letters stated that they had their trust in
Nike to resolve this situation expeditiously. It remains to be seen
how long it takes for the patience of those same administrators
to be tested.
What you can do immediately:
1) Contact Nike: Nikes actions to date have been insufficient
to ensure that worker rights are respected at the Kuk Dong factory.
Urge Nike to publicly ask Kukdong to rehire all the workers, whether
they were fired of coerced into resignation. Ask Nike to immediately
ensure that returning workers are protected from reprisals and intimidation
by supporting the immediate placement of independent monitors on
the scene, the removal of the armed riot police, and that returning
Kuk Dong workers not suffer reprisals and not be required to re-sign
any loyalty oaths and be given the seniority status and pay they
deserve. Remind Nike to publicly commit to continue the same levels
of production at Kuk Dong and that justice delayed is justice denied.
Contact:
Philip H. Knight, Chairman and CEO, Nike Corp., One Bowerman Drive,
Beaverton, OR 97003-6433. Phone: (503) 671-6453; Fax: (503) 671-6300
Add a cc to: Dusty Kidd, Global Director for Labor Practices, Nike
Corp., One Bowerman Drive, Beaverton, OR 97003. Phone: (503) 671-6453;
Fax: (503) 532- 0440; Email: Dusty.Kidd@nike.com.
2) Contact the Mexican Labor Secretary: Urge the Labor Secretary
to use this conflict as an opportunity to prove that Mexico is a
fair and stable place for people to work without violent intimidation,
armed goons in factories in the midst of a labor dispute, and that
all workers enjoy the right to organize independent unions.
Contact: Lic. Carlos Abascal Carranza, Secretaría del Trabajo
y Previsión Social, Periférico Sur No. 4271, Edif.
A, piso 4, Col. Fuentes del pedregal C.P. 14149. Phone: 011-52-5-645-2962;
Fax: 011-52-5-645-5594; Email cabascal@stps.gob.mx
The Kuk Dong Story: A Strike, A Police Attack, An Agreement, and
Mass Firings By US/Labor Education in the Americas Project
The strike at the Kuk Dong factory in southern Mexico that produces
for Nike and many U.S. universities began on Jan 9th due to the
company firing or forcing the resignation of 25 workers who had
complained about rotten food in the cafeteria and low wages. The
workers say the union at the factory, the FROC CROC, which is considered
a union tied to the conservative Mexican political party, the PRI,
is not representing their interests and want to create a new independent
union in its place. Finally, workers complain of forced overtime
(including 14 to 16 year old workers who are legally required to
work no more than 6 hours a day and are instead working 10), verbal
abuse, and failure to give legally mandated benefits.
The strikers were picketing the factory gates when around 10:30pm
on Thursday the 11th of January, workers reported that known enforcers
of the FROC-CROC union attempted to provoke a confrontation with
the 300 or so remaining workers at the factory gates, which was
unsuccessful. Soon after this, 200 riot police surrounded the workers
in front of the plant and told the workers that they had been ordered
by the Governor to remove the workers from the area. The workers
put up no resistance but the police nevertheless used violence to
disperse them and workers were beaten severely by the police. Fifteen
workers were sent to the hospital and two people had injuries severe
enough to require hospitalization. There are even reports that the
police were being directed by a leader of the FROC-CROC union, implying
cooperation between the police and the company.
Two days later, an agreement was reached to allow the strikers
to return to work without reprisals. The company agreed to distribute
copies of this agreement to all the workers. However, when the workers
tried to go back to work with copies of the agreement in hand, the
guards at the factory gates would not let many return unless they
signed a loyalty oath to the FROC-CROC. Then hundreds of returning
workers were either fired or forced to resign.
|