|
(More
on this case) ( !! Note that Kukdong changed it's name sept
2001 to Mex Mode )
The following was received from US/LEAP February 6,
2001:
Feb. 2 2001, The Verite report on Kuk Dong
ACTIVITY REPORT - TUESDAY 6 FEBRUARY 2001 - KUKDONG INTERNATIONAL
The Verité Audit Team and the Verité Observer spent
the day at the Kukdong factory in order to:
- Observe and note how workers who had left the factory during
the work stoppage were being received when re-applying for a job
at the factory
- Observe and note how the union was dealing with workers
- Conduct a comprehensive management interview
- Interview workers on-site
- Conduct a comprehensive health & safety inspection of the
factory facilities
ARRIVAL AT THE FACTORY:
Upon arriving at the factory, Daniel Long with the Worker's Rights
Consortium was at the front gate taking notes. Verité team
members and the Verité Observer introduced themselves. Daniel
Long told us that he had received instructions not to talk to us.
We told him that we understood and left him there on his own.
Inside the factory:
We identified ourselves to the guards who let us in without any
problem. Inside the courtyard, about 60 former workers stood in
line in front of the buildings main entrance while 20 newcomers
were filling application forms. The general mood was a bit tense.
A few tough-looking and heavily armed guards blocked the entrance
to the main building and others observed the scene from a short
distance.
A4 sheets posted on the Coke machine announced that workers who
wanted to return to work would not face any reprisal and their rights
would be respected as any other worker.
While asking workers about the process of reintegration, a man
dispatched by the head of security came to a team member and said,
"Sr. Alberto told me that you needed something and he sent
me here to help you." The auditor thanked the man, but declined
his assistance. This was taken as a signal to the auditor to maintain
distance from the workers so as to not jeopardize them. The workers
were told to give their names and the date they left the factory
and would later be told whether or not they could return to work.
A few workers from a village were sent to investigate the mood
and conditions of rehiring. If conditions were acceptable, then
the rest of the former workers from their village would return.
In the meantime, they were concerned about retaliation.
When we arrived, the line was pretty long but our presence stimulated
the process. Inside the building, a few women who had been accepted
back to work were waiting in the corridor in front of the entrance
into the lines hall. The team member later realized that they
were waiting to get into the union office, a requirement prior to
starting work.
All these observations took place while waiting for the President,
Mr. S.K. Byun and the General Manager, Mr. Hoon Park to take part
in the introduction meeting.
INTRODUCTION MEETING WITH HIGHER MANAGEMENT:
After a round of introductions and an explanation of Verité's
presence, Mr. Byun took the floor and explained the following several
points:
¨ The management had originally intended to re-hire former
workers at their previous level until the end of January after which
date they would be re-hired at the same conditions as new workers.
As Nike and Reebok had insisted that the factory should make sure
that all workers were notified, the factory launched a media campaign.
The factory printed ads in the newspapers, broadcasted on the radio,
posted information on all 19 community buses, hired a speakerperson
to go from village to village and expanded the deadline for workers
to be re-hired at their previous level until Friday February 2nd.
¨ After Tuesday February 6th, returning workers would be treated
as newcomers and would be assessed and judged suitable for re-employment
accordingly. When asked which criteria would apply, management told
me that the Korean supervisors knew their people and would pick
the "good" workers and not the bad ones (a
good worker being one who "does not give headaches" and
who is efficient).
¨ Today (Tuesday), the union would gather workers for an "education
session," in accordance with what Nike and Reebok required,
and the conciliation and arbitration board would come to the factory
on Thursday and Friday to explain, among other things, the steps
to follow to put a new union into place.
After this short conversation, the team divided and each member
dealt with one's assigned tasks. At that point, we noticed that
a Caucasian man was around and we learned that it was Nike representative
who had actually come to the factory that day to attend the conciliation
and arbitration board sessions that had been postponed to the end
of this week. Gabriel Llaguno, Nike's Corporate Responsibility Compliance
Manager, was supportive of our job and offered to be of assistance
should we face any problems.
BACK TO THE REINTEGRATION PROCESS:
Outside, the same people the team member had met at 8 a.m. were
still waiting, three hours later, without being told what they had
to wait for. As it turned out, they had to stop at the union office
- where the team member followed part of them - to fill out and
sign a form on which the following text is written (rough translation):
I hereby am contacting this union to let it know that I have made
the decision to formally join the group that you represent. I am
aware of the status and I commit myself to respect the latter as
well as the agreements, commitments and decisions that are taken
during the meetings, congress and councils of your organization
and those of the CROC at which you are affiliated at both state
and national levels. Expecting a positive decision from your partÖ
Puebla, date, name, age, address, place of origin, recruitment date,
previous job and signature".
In the meeting the team member attended, union representatives
reluctantly provided the group of workers with a copy of the bargaining
agreement so they could read it. Yet, the atmosphere was so tense
that some of the workers were feeling uncomfortable and sometimes
looked at the team member for a sense of direction which the team
member could obviously not provide. Few of them read the document
but all of them signed the forms to join the union anyway.
During this meeting, the team member spoke in a corner to Luis
J.C.Lee, Head of Administration, who told me that it was not compulsory
that the workers joined the union. When I asked him why they then
did not tell the workers so, he was very uncomfortable and took
me outside of the room to explain that they, the management, were
not very happy with the union and that the latter had imposed on
them since the beginning. He added that they would rather have had
the union from McDonald's (whose name he forgot) for that union
promoted training for their workers and other positive points.
When the team member came out of the union room, the team member
talked to a group that had signed the union application form. When
the team member asked whether the union had provided them with a
copy of the bargaining agreement, they told the team member no.
As the team member suspected, they only provided it to the group
that the team member accompanied because the team member was present
to witness their procedures.
After signing this form, workers were told that those recruited
would be informed within a week via a telegram. Those who would
not receive anything were to consider that they failed to get the
job. Workers complained that while there was a sign posted on the
Coke machine saying that no one would face retaliation, not to be
hired would be a form of retaliation. After that, they left. It
was about 1pm.
THE NEWCOMERS:
Have to fill an application form, provide copies of the birth certificate,
school records and housing bill. Mr. Lee insisted that they would
double-check their date of birth since some potential hires were
actually younger than they claimed.
UNION EDUCATION SESSIONS:
The union started in the morning to "educate" the workers.
They took them line by line; about 35 people attended each session.
A rough translation of the presentation of Jaime Sanchez Juarez,
the Union's Secretary General, follows:
We are here today to explain what we can do for you. As you might
not be aware, the problems at Kukdong are no longer local but international.
We are concerned about the image of the factory outside. The factory
has acquired a very bad reputation because of the media reports
that have been circulating worldwide and through Internet giving
a lot of false information about what is happening here. This is
why we have had and will have a lot of visits from representatives
from Nike, Reebok, as well as NGOs, like this lady here to assess
the working conditions of this factory. So we ask you to tell the
truth about what is going here and dismiss all the allegations according
to which you are being beaten, the food you eat is rotten, etc..
If this goes on, Nike, Reebok and other clients will stop using
the factory and we will stay unemployed. You have to tell them that
you want to work in peace. We already adjusted some salaries, we
will propose to the management that they give you the 12 pesos,
equivalent to the lunch you get at the cafeteria, so you can bring
your own food. We are building a new cafeteria that should open
around 15 March and we will ask the management to change the food
provider. In addition to the raise you got from 15 January, we will
ask management to make it retroactive as from 1 January. We also
obtained four additional paid days off. There will be a commission
on food and hygiene. People have to be aware of the benefits you
have. If there are problems, talk to the Koreans and if they do
not do anything, come to us. We cannot come to talk to you while
you are in the lines for we do not want to disrupt your work but
you have named a representative within your group. You should go
to her when you are experiencing problems and then she should then
talk to the union who will then talk to the management. The union
wants to support you. If we failed, we ask you to give us another
opportunity. You have to support us so we can support you.
Then followed a dialogue with the workers to make them aware of
the issues at stake and urging them to understand and support the
tough job of their representative. We should point out that in some
lines, people are so young, 20 years on average, that they behave
in a rather immature way and may not be very conscious of what this
is all about.
Some workers expressed concerned with regards to transportation.
It is true that the majority of them live far out in the countryside
(we have experienced that on Monday) and need transportation. While
the majority has access to buses contracted by the factory, few
of them do not, at least until their village. There is one specific
case for people living in Magdalena. Before the stoppage, they used
to be 24 workers coming from this village, now they are only five.
The factory thinks that it is too costly to contract a bus for five
people but workers say that if transportation is available, the
rest of the workers from their village will come back to work.
Some workers talked about the incentives they used to have and
that were much appreciated, such a receiving a "torta"
upon completion of one year of work, or the attribution of some
kind of a diploma/honorary plate for the best worker of the month
etc. The union explained that these practices had to stop further
to the situation that was currently taking place but would resume
once the situation cleared.
Workers also mentioned that indeed, the food had improved over
the past two weeks and that if it were to remain as such, they would
go on using the cafeteria.
Some mentioned that when hired, they were told they would receive
a raise every three month but that it never materialized.
A lot of promises were made that should be confirmed as to their
implementation in the near future.
When Mr. Sanchez was asked if a union representative was always
around he said that Jose Luis Ruiz was the person in charge at the
factory.
FINAL MEETING WITH MANAGEMENT:
The Verité audit team leaders had a final talk with Mr.
Byun and Mr. Park. The day was pretty hard for them with the Verité
and Nike visits. They were eager to hear what we had to tell them
and openly expressed their concerns. They informed us that they
had already increased workers' salaries, that they were much above
the minimum wage and that their were considering increasing more.
They added that they had asked both their general and criminal lawyers
to drop the charges they had intended against one of their staff
and five outsiders (see final report).
|