HomeWhat's newSearchAbout usFrequently Asked QuestionsLinksContact
 
Urgent AppealsCampaignsNewsCompaniesPublicationsCodes of Conduct

(More on this case) ( !! Note that Kukdong changed it's name sept 2001 to Mex Mode )

January 25, 2001, update on Kukdong case

Fair Labor Association statement Source: U.S./LEAP
Statement from Sam Brown January 25, 2001

We continue to follow the situation at the Kukdong factory. There is little, credible, objective information available. As reported last week it Mexican attorney, Arturo Alcalde, working with the International Labor Rights Fund has been to the factory. He has made recommendations to insure that Mexican, international, and FLA standards on freedom of association are observed. He is particularly concerned about continuing allegations that severance pay is being used to silence workers. The FLA Code of Conduct is clear on this issue, and one of the Benchmarks for interpreting performance under the Code says that, "Employers shall not offer or use severance pay (or "indemnicization" in Latin Ameica) as a means of restricting union formation or union operations."

Although, NIKE currently has no production in this factory they have been responsive to suggestions for ways insure that the FLA Code is upheld. Mr. Alcalde has encouraged NIKE to send an official to the factory with instructions to strongly reiterate to factory management Nike's support for worker freedom of association and strict compliance with the workplace Code of' Conduct. Nike has had a responsible official on the ground at the factory who has made this point to factory management. Mr. Alcalde and the NIKE representative have been in contact and have discussed next steps.

Reebok has also had production in this factory and has been engaged in an effort to assemble the facts in a thoughtful way, to respond to the situation as the facts become known, surd to make clear to factory management Reebok's commitment to freedom of association and to the FLA Code provisions on this and other subjects.

In light of the continuing allegations, an urgent and comprehensive independent review of these allegations ?? and others -? by an accredited independent monitor familiar with Mexican law and skilled ire factory monitoring is highly desirable. Fortunately on Tuesday, ire the culmination of a process that has been underway for marry months, the FLA accredited Verite, a Massachusetts not for profit firm, as its first monitor for work in Mexico. It is my understanding that Nike and Reebok are proceeding to make arrangements with Verite to undertake the required independent monitoring.

**********************************

Press release from Nike

NIKE REITERATES ITS SUPPORT FOR AN INDEPENDENT, ACCREDITED MONITOR FOR KUKDONG MEXICO FACTORY

January 25, 2001

Nike has been actively engaged in bringing a resolution to the ongoing labor dispute occurring at the Kukdong factory ire Puebla, Mexico. Mike shams the concern of all interested parties that this situation be resolved fairly arid expeditiously and that all Kukdong tears be treated with dignity and respect For that reason, upon hearing them was a dispute At the factory, Mike acted immediately to effectively address this situation. Nike has been working with a number of individuals and organizations inducting an Independent?14156f expert, our compliance officer on the ground In Pueblo, Kukdong factory management, third pony labor rights advocates currently in Puebla, students and other interested parties. Politicizing this issue is not in the toot interest of any of the parties.

Last Friday, Nike initiated a call to the Fair Labor Association (FLA) and its university affiliate board member, the Kukdong factory management, Reebok and the Workers' Rights Consortium (WRC) to jointly agree upon an independent, trained external monitor so that the facts of this situation may fully be assessed and remediation cars begin as soon as possible. While the WRC has shown interest in this issue, Nike does not consider their group to be an objective or trained monitoring organization, as evidenced by their recent preliminary findings,

Nike is committed to working with tie FLA and its university affiliate board member, the Kukdong management, Reebok, and the WRC to agree upon and commission an independent monitor to conduct a full investigation of the alleged labor compliance violations at the facility. Nike, the FLA, and its university affiliate board member. Reebok and the factory have all agreed to use the FLA certified independent monitoring organization Verite, a non?profit group based in Amherst, Massachusetts, to achieve this goal. In addition, Nike is committed to working with the Kukdong factory management to ensure they are compliant with Nike's internal Code of conduct.

Nike supports they rights of alt Kukdong workers to return to the factory without reprisal. Nike has maintained from the beginning that workers have the right to organize and collectively seek fair and independent resolutions to disputes such as these. It is Nike's understanding that the factory management is working to facilitate the return of workers, who choose to come back to the factory regardless of which union they support. In addition, the factory has made arrangements for workers who, for various reasons, have chosen not to return to work yet, to return when the situation at the factory normalizes or collect severance in accordance with Mexican labor law.

Nike will work with all parties committed to this process by coupling monitoring with remediation to further strengthen our commitment to long?term improvements for workers. Nike and FLA members are working toward one of conduct that everyone can follow. Our mutual challenge is to work toward the continuous improvement of factory conditions through active and collaborative involvement by all stakeholders. By recognizing each other's responsibilities, we can rapidly advance our mutual goals of human rights and workplace dignity.

Nike once again calls upon all parties to use care and restraint in making any charges or drawing any conclusions about these complex issues until full and independent monitoring assessment can be completed. We also encourage interested parties to visit our Web site www.nikebiz.com for mare details and the most current information about company's corporate responsibility programs.

*******************************************************

Following is a recent report issued by the International Labor Rights Rund (ILRF) investigation of the Kukdong factory

INTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FUND 733 15th Street, NW, #920 Washington, DC 20005

Report to Universities Affiliated with the Fair Labor Association Regarding the Kukdong International Conflict in Axtlico, Peubla, Mexico

January 25, 2001

On January 12, the International Labor Rights Fund contacted Nike compliance officials regarding a conflict at a plant in Mexico which had been producing Nike sweatshirts for the collegiate market. As a consequence of that conversation, we accepted a request from Nike to find a knowledgeable labor attorney in Mexico who could conduct an independent investigation on our behalf about a situation in which the company was receiving multiple and contradictory reports.

The same day, ILRF contacted Mr. Arturo Alcalde Justiniani, a key independent labor lawyer who has been president of the National Democratic Lawyers Association of Mexico, and who serves as the attorney for a number of independent non-officialista unions in Mexico. Mr. Alcalde has also been a member of the ILRF board of directors for a number of years.

On Monday January 15, Mr. Alcalde visited the factory in Axtlico and interviewed company officials, local labor department officials, company lawyers, workers both in the factory and on strike outside, and representatives of the CROC and UNT, two competitive union federations. He reported his findings to us, which in summary form, concluded that the major issue was the failure of the company to reinstate workers who had been on strike over a variety of issues and the negative impact this would have on any subsequent union representation election. An agreement had been reached by management with local labor authorities to reinstate all the striking or fired workers, but when workers attempted to regain their jobs they were being rejected unless they signed statements in support of the CROC union, which Arturo reported had been given a sweetheart contract by management without the knowledge of the workers. Company lawyers were reported to be giving severance payments to any workers rejected by CROC, thus effectively removing from the factory any workers who had been brave enough to complain about workplace conditions. We also consulted with the AFL-CIO representative in Mexico, Jeff Hermanson, whose interpretation of the situation matched that of Arturo Alcalde's. Alcalde strongly recommended that Nike send someone to the factory with the authority to insist that all workers be reinstated, not just those loyal to the CROC union.

Nike has acted on these recommendations in good faith, insofar as we are currently able to determine. The Nike compliance office supervisor for Latin America, Gabriel Llaguno, has visited the factory again, and today has confirmed that the CROC representative was, as Alcalde had reported, refusing to allow workers who had sought a new union to regain their jobs. A meeting at the factory is scheduled for later today to correct this, at which the ILRF will be represented by Arturo Alcalde.

Reebok officials, we understand, have also met with Kukdong's parent company, urging a firm statement of support for a free and fair union representation election and reinstatement of all workers who were on strike.

We understand that the Worker Rights Consortium also sent an investigation team from the United States early this week to examine the situation. Their preliminary report, issued today, confirms in most particulars the findings of Arturo Alcalde from his visits beginning last week.

We believe that the crisis at the Kukdong factory can be resolved, if action is taken swiftly to re-employ all the workers who were on strike and to allow a free and fair election to take place in the factory. When it comes to union representation, justice delayed is justice denied. Following such reinstatements, the allegations of labor rights violations that caused the January 9 - 12 walkout can be fairly investigated and, where confirmed, corrected.

We understand that the Fair Labor Association has accredited an independent monitor, Verite, who has been contracted to carry out a full investigation and independent audit of the factory. ILRF will continue to monitor these developments and cooperate with all who are seeking a fair resolution for the workers of Kukdong.

Go to the top of the pageTell a friend about this siteJoin the Urgent Action Network