Monday, 01 September 2003 14:33
| Legal Analysis of PT Kahatex Sweater Division Case 26 Sept 2003
Overview: Substantial evidence shows that PT Kahatex Sweater has violated several core domestic and international labor laws since May 2003 (wage violations have been documented as far back as 2001) including laws regarding:
Wages & Fines:
Overtime and Forced Homework:
Strike/ Lock Out:
Severance (Coercion) & Freedom of Association: Two workers were taken into police custody after a fight that broke out on the picket line in front of the factory compound. PT Kahatex managers, Harja Haruman and Nelson S. tried to convince the locked-out workers to resign and accept less than legal severance in exchange for the factory using its influence to gain the release of the arrested workers. Such actions constitute a gross violation of college and university codes of conduct, Indonesian law and international law. Using arrest and the threat of prosecution to force workers to resign their jobs is unacceptable and any such action must cease. Any resignation made under such circumstances would be invalid and the workers would maintain their right to immediate reinstatement with back pay. See July 16th Agreement and accompanying Affidavit All of the workers locked out were active in the KPS, Komite Pekerja Buruh (Sweater Worker's Committee) this is not a registered union, but it publicly know as being affiliated with PPB, a local garment union. The two arrested workers were KPS leaders. Reinstatement: Regarding the severance agreement you are referring to, you have heard faulty and misleading information from PT Kahatex management. The July 16th agreement laid out the terms for a "settlement package" or "termination bonus", but it was clearly understood by both parties at the time of it's signing that this in no way precluded reinstatement, in fact workers were verbally promised by Harja Haruman and Nelson S. at the time of signing the agreement that they would all be reinstated to PT Kahatex Sweater, though in stages (groups of 100 or so employees at a time) and at the loss of their accrued seniority. Of the few workers who taken back as employees at Kahatex, all have lost their former seniority, status as permanent employees, and have been told that they can only become members of SPSI or SBSI unions (not PPB/ KPS). Leave/ Women's Rights
Health Insurance: Kahatex Sweater Division does not provide the legally required health insurance, JPK, or a better alternative. Important Note: Indonesian legal structure is such that issue specific laws such as Kep-150/MEN/2000 and UU21/2000 (Trade Union Act), sometimes referred to as "peraturan pelaksanaan" (regulations regarding proper implementation of general laws), are considered legally superior to general acts such as UU13/2003. According to this principle, Kep-150/MEN/2000 legally supercedes UU13/2003 in terms of issues related to industrial disputes. Furthermore, none of the peraturan pelaksanaan of UU13/2003 have been written yet. Given this fact one must use the current peraturan pelaksanaan such as Kep150/MEN/2000, until a regulation is written to take its place. Notes:
|