
Index
|
NEWSLETTER 24,
Oct 2007
In Brief
|
|

Makeshift
tent housing workers striking for
union rights at Wal-Mart supplier
Chong Won in the Philippines
|
CCC Input
to the United Nations
The Clean Clothes Campaign
International Secretariat has been in correspondence
with John Ruggie, the United Nations Secretary-General's
Special Representative on Business and Human
Rights. In our five-page letter dated 23
March 2007, the CCC offers Ruggie suggestions
on how multinational companies could improve
labour conditions in supply chains and takes
a critical look at the general impact of
corporate social responsibility initiatives,
voluntary supply chain initiatives, stakeholder
involvement, and so on. The CCC letter can
be found at: www.cleanclothes.org/ftp/070323_CCC_to_Ruggie.pdf
In his response, Ruggie agrees
with much that we say. For example, "I
think it is a well-established fact by now
that supply chain monitoring by itself has
a limited impact on inducing behavioral
changes" and he agrees with the need
to involve state actors. However, he warns
that, while his mandate is broad, his time
is limited. He is going to concentrate on
"overall system architecture".
Find Ruggie's letter at: www.cleanclothes.org/ftp/070417-Ruggie_to_ccc.pdf.
The CCC International Secretariat
is helping Ruggie to organise an expert
workshop on improving human rights performance
of business through multi-stakeholder initiatives.
The workshop, hosted by the Netherlands
Ministry of Development Cooperation, will
be held November 6 and 7th.
GSCP: By Business,
For Business
The Global Social Compliance
Programme (GSCP), launched in 2006, represents
business' latest proposal to address sweatshop
conditions in the global supply chains of
multinational corporations. Behind the initiative
are the giant retailers Carrefour, Metro,
Migros, Tesco and Wal-Mart, in collaboration
with CIES - The Food Business Forum. CIES
is a network of CEOs and senior managers
of nearly 400 food companies in over 150
countries, headquartered in Paris.
The GSCP aims to promote the
"harmonization of existing codes and
implementation systems". It wants "to
build consensus on best practices and develop
a harmonized message for suppliers globally
in order to reduce duplication of effort
and accelerate progress in monitoring of
working conditions."
In recent months, the GSCP
has been inviting labour rights organisations
to take part in the GSCP Advisory Board
and to give comments on their draft code.
The CCC has rejected the GSCP's
invitation. The problem is that GSCP membership
is only open to companies. Their engagement
with stakeholders - whom they name as the
ILO, NGOs and trade unions - is in an advisory
capacity only, and after key decisions have
already been taken.
We told the GSCP: "We
do not believe that companies
either
acting alone or together, possess the credibility
to address these issues by themselves
Only the multi-stakeholder organizations
that involve others in the design, implementation
and governance of their operations can lay
claim to any measure of credibility."
In addition, the letter expresses
a concern that the GSCP could become a vehicle
for companies that are hostile toward trade
unions and help them gain a façade
of credibility without changing their practices.
Particularly the role of Wal-Mart in this
initiative serious raises questions concerning
the character and purpose of the GSCP.
Read the June 8, 2007 CCC
letter to the GSCP at www.cleanclothes.org/codes/07-06-11.htm.
To visit the GSCP website: www.ciesnet.com/2-wwedo/index.asp.
Wal-Mart: "Top-down
monitoring built to fail"
US-based Wal-Mart is the largest
retailer in the world, with 3,800 stores
in the US, and 2,800 in some 13 other countries.
Its new slogan for customers is "Save
Money Live Better" but it also has
a "Wal-Mart Ethical Standards"
program that is, in the words of Vice President
of Ethical Standards Rajan Kamalanathan,
"in place to do what is right for factory
workers and the environment".
In August 2007, Wal-Mart released
its "Ethical Sourcing Report"
for 2006. Wal-Mart says it was based on
over 16,000 audits at 8,873 factories producing
goods for its stores, more audits than ever.
It also claims other improvements such as
better environmental criteria.
The response of Wal-Mart Watch
and Students and Scholars against Corporate
Misbehavior (SACOM) was to issue another
report, this one on the conditions in toy
factories in China that supply Wal-Mart.
China is Wal-Mart's largest sourcing country.
The SACOM report shows serious
and wide-ranging labour violations there,
from wage and hour violations, to unsafe
working conditions, illegal firings, unsanitary
housing, and coerced audit responses from
workers. It is based on off-site interviews
with 82 workers at five Wal-Mart toy supplier
factories in the cities of Shenzhen and
Zhuhai.
SACOM describes why Wal-Mart
auditors fail to grasp the reality at their
Chinese suppliers. At the Tai Hsing factory
in Shenzhen, managers conducted "training
sessions" with workers on how to answer
questions from Wal-Mart's auditors in preparation
for pre-announced inspections. Managers
warned workers, "If you answer auditors'
questions incorrectly, we get to lose orders
and you get to lose your job".
SACOM also reports, "When
Tai Qiang workers petitioned the Wal-Mart
corporate responsibility department in April
2005 to set up a worker-run union in accordance
with the Chinese law, they received no reply."
Highlighting the recent recall
of unsafe toys produced in China, Wal-Mart
Watch's David Nassar adds, "It is not
a stretch to draw a connection between the
pressure Wal-Mart puts on its suppliers
for low cost merchandise, the problems at
these factories, and the safety issues of
the products". He calls Wal-Mart's
own report "an attempt to avoid responsibility
for the problems the company itself has
created".
Wal-Mart's "Ethical Sourcing
Report for 2006"
Available at walmartstores.com/Files/2006ReportonEthicalSour
cing.pdf
"The Story of Toys Made
in China for Wal-Mart"
SACOM, Hong Kong, June 2007
Available in English at www.sacom.hk/html/uploads/WalMart%
20Report(SACOM)Jun2007.pdf, and in Chinese
at www.sacom.hk/html/uploads/WalMartCHINESE2007.pdf
Wal-Mart Watch: www.walmartwatch.com
"Discounting Rights:
Wal-Mart's Violation of US Workers' Right
to Freedom of Association", Human Rights
Watch, US, May 2007
GoodElectronics
Network Launched
Inspired by global networks
such as the Clean Clothes Campaign, a new
network has been launched to take up labour
rights and environmental concerns in the
context of the global electronics industry.
The new initiative, known
as the GoodElectronics network, already
links 150 NGOs and trade unions. The main
focus of the network is to strengthen grassroots
organisations and workers in their local
and global struggle for human rights and
a sustainable environment.
The network was formally launched
in May 2007 at a meeting in Bangkok attended
by 50 representatives from all over the
world. Its coordination is hosted by the
Netherlands-based Centre for Research on
Multinational Corporations (SOMO).
The network's founding announcement
notes that: "
the electronics
industry has evolved into the fastest growing
global industry. With that it has created
a wide variety of worker and environmental
challenges. Many of these challenges are
comparable to those of the garment industry,
including the undermining of international
rights such as freedom of association, a
living wage, and responsible health and
safety measures
"
The CCC looks forward to working
together with GoodElectronics on relevant
cases and campaigns and wishes the network
success with their important work.
For more information on the
network and its activities, see www.goodelectronics.org
|