HomeWhat's newSearchAbout usFrequently Asked QuestionsLinksContact
 
Urgent AppealsCampaignsNewsCompaniesPublicationsCodes of Conduct

NEWSLETTER 14, JULY 2001

The European Parliament Hearing:

Phoning adidas, but no one picks up

The Resolution of the European Parliament (EP) on Standards for European Enterprises in developing countries, also known as the Howitt Resolution, was adopted in January 1999. This resolution calls on the European Commission to, among other things, establish a model code of conduct for European businesses when operating abroad, and establish a European Monitoring Platform. Until these things are set up, the resolution calls for annual hearings to be held in the Euro Parliament and special rapporteurs to be appointed to report on the good and bad practices of European multinational organizations (MNOs).

European Parliamentary Hearing

In November 2000, the first hearing in relation to this resolution was organised by the Commission of Development and Cooperation. Adidas and Nestlé were invited to participate.
Wereldsolidariteit, a Belgium organization that is a member of the Flemish-speaking Belgian CCC, was notoriously present, with members wearing T-shirts that said: "A living wage cleans clothes" (leefbaar loon maakt kleren schoon). These shirts were also worn by the Belgian soccer team AA Gent. Wereldsolidariteit wanted to present adidas with the more than 50,000 signatures and photos that were collected from supporters demanding a living wage. Adidas hadn't come to Belgium in May 2000 to accept these signatures, and again failed to show up.

Both adidas and Nestlé refused to attend the EP hearing -- unfortunate, but not totally unexpected. Instead, the companies sent their auditors. This was met by a lot of criticism from members of the European Parliament, who noticed that companies always managed to make it to the Parliament to lobby for their interests, but when the European Parliament has questions for them they don't show up. The spokesperson for Verite, a social auditing company which was sent by adidas, then made the hilarious gesture of giving the phone number of the adidas public relations person who could be reached to answer questions. When this number was dialled, there was, of course, no answer.

The hearing included presentations by NGOs and researchers on the behavior of Nestlé and Adidas in developing countries. Regarding adidas there were reports by Rainy Hutabarat, a researcher in Indonesia. She reported that her research into labour conditions in a factory that produces for adidas turned up forced overtime, a wage well below the legal minimum, and physical and verbal abuse of workers. After reporting this to adidas, there were some small improvements. On the whole, concluded Hutabarat, codes of conduct have not led to meaningful change. The minimum wage should be replaced by a living wage, she said, so that workers are no longer forced to work overtime. Workers at factories supplying adidas should be educated on the adidas code of conduct and involved in its monitoring, which should be done on an institutional basis in close cooperation's with NGOs and trade unions, she said.

Ratna Sapari from the Institute for Social History in Amsterdam highlighted the weaknesses of legal frameworks in Indonesia. She stressed the importance of outside intervention to protect workers who remain in a weak position. According to her, Northern governments should endorse binding measures to regulate the behavior of transnational corporations. After questions and remarks by members of the European Parliament, chairmen Joaquim Miranda concluded the morning with the remark that voluntary commitments were clearly not sufficient for companies to implement social standards.

Follow up

Not much has happened since the hearing took place. In February 2001, the CCC wrote a letter to Miranda, chairman of the Euro Parliament's Development Committee, and to the members of the committee to inquire about new developments in implementation of the resolution. When the campaign received no reply, Miranda was contacted again. According to him, nothing has happened so far. In early May the Commission will have a meeting where the Howitt resolution will be discussed. Howitt himself would like to have a hearing in 2001, but it's not clear yet on which sectors. The CCC feels it would be a good idea to organize another hearing on a garment or sports shoe company, because the company that was invited for the 2000 hearing did not show up.

Meanwhile though the CCC is concerned about the implementation of the resolution. Although there has been a hearing there still hasn't been any rapporteur appointed, and there has been no action taken to implement the other parts of the resolution. The CCC will be lobbying both the European Parliament and the European Commission to implement the resolution. Keep an eye on the CCC website for updates on this campaign. At the moment the campaign is considering which European companies to recommend that the Development Committee invite to the next hearings. Please contact the CCC in Amsterdam with any suggestions.

More on the Howitt resolution can be found here

Go to the top of the pageTell a friend about this siteJoin the Urgent Action Network