Feb 19, 2007
Indian supplier of Euro/US
Brands Gags Rights Activists Clean
Clothes Campaign & India Committee of the Netherlands
Court
denies Indian labour organizations right to speak
about working conditions in garment factory
For immediate release
Amsterdam, February 19, 2007
The court of the City Civil Judge at Bangalore
ruled today to impose a restraining order on five
Indian labour organizations that had spoken out
about problems at a garment factory producing
for top European and US brands, the Clean Clothes
Campaign and the India Committee of the Netherlands
report today.
A temporary restraining order had already been
in place since 28 July 2006, when the owner of
the Fibres and Fabrics International (FFI) and
Jeans Knit (JKPL) factories sought to legally
silence the Garment and Textile Workers' Union
(GATWU), Women Garment Workers Front (Munnade),
Civil Initiatives for Development and Peace (CIVIDEP),
New Trade Union Initiative (NTUI), and Clean Clothes
Campaign Task Force in India from sharing information
on rights violations at FFI.
Since May 2006 the Clean Clothes Campaign and
the India Committee of the Netherlands have publicly
supported the workers and labour organisations
to improve the labour conditions and labour relations
at FFI and JKPL. FFI, producing for international
brand name companies, including Ann Taylor, Armani,
Gap, G-Star, Guess, Mexx, and RaRe, has a history
of workers rights violations. Workers´
testimonies collected by the local trade union
GATWU document wide-ranging violations of workers´
rights and human rights in the FFI and JKPL production
units during 2005 and 2006. The violations included
harassment and abuse of workers, arbitrary termination
of services without following due legal process,
and absence of proper safety measures. An independent
fact-finding committee consisting of local human
rights organisations and social activists has
backed up these claims.
The restraining order issued today is a heavy
blow to the fundamental right to freedom of speech
and freedom of association in India. "Instead
of engaging in a constructive dialogue with the
local organizations to resolve the outstanding
problems, FFI management went to court to silence
them," said Esther de Haan, coordinator of
the CCC International Secretariat. "At the
same time the intimidation of FFI workers continued,
with some workers being forced to resign. Continuously
workers are reminded that their organizing is
not going to be accepted by their bosses".
This order is preventing workers organizations
from reporting violations of workers rights.
Ashim Roy, President of GATWU and General Secretary
of NTUI believes that "the grounds for constraining
our freedom of expression are not proper and reasonable,
and not consistent with the constitution, and
its interpretations given by the Supreme Court
of this country with respect to the freedom of
expression. In deference to the judiciary, we
will abide by this order but shall immediately
appeal against it in the High Court of Karnataka."
"The union has always stood for negotiated
settlement of issues and even now suggest to FFI/JKPL
to engage in dialogue with workers' organisations
to resolve issues" said Jayaram, vice-president
of GATWU.
In January FFI also threatened to take legal
action against Dutch organizations working on
this case. The Clean Clothes Campaign and the
India Committee of the Netherlands continue to
call for FFI to enter into a mediated dialogue
with the Indian organizations to resolve the problems
at the factory. The CCC is in an ongoing dialogue
with FFI/JKPLs clients about their role
in resolving rights violations at their supplier.
For more information on FFI/JKPL, see
http://www.cleanclothes.org/urgent/07-01-10.htm