Why are codes of conduct so important?
We see the CCC model code of conduct as a strategic tool in getting
companies to comply with the international labour standards that
it lists. As a tool, the code is a clear way to communicate the
standards the campaign seeks to have implemented. The "code-debate"
became our vehicle for getting the issue of labour rights and the
responsibility of trans-national corporations into the public arena.
At the same time "a code of conduct" came to have different
meanings for different people.
Section one of the code also outlines its scope and says something
about the context and our own expectations. For us, it's only
one tool from a toolbox, whose value is dependent on the quality
of the other tools in that box.
We use the CCC model code of conduct as a tool to raise awareness,
pressure companies and to provide guidance for laws that can be
adopted at the national level.
Governments have a major role in ensuring good labour standards
in their countries. But in some producing countries labour legislation
is inherently weak. In many countries with good labour legislation,
enforcement is lax. This is due to the fact that governments compete
intensely among each other to attract investment in the garment
sector at whatever cost.
Garment workers' unions are in a difficult position because they
often lack bargaining power to improve labour conditions due to
threatened relocation or informalisation (moving into informal
labour) of the production. In many countries unions and their
members suffer from discrimination or even outright repression.
Together with other consumer and labour organisations, the CCC
urges western clothing retailers to commit themselves to ensuring
decent labour conditions in their subcontractors' factories by
adopting and enforcing a code (preferably using the CCC model
code as a blueprint and incorporating its standards) and including
it as a condition in their purchasing agreements.
The provisions in codes of conduct should never be used to undermine
national legislation (where it provides better protection), or
as a pretext to avoid vigorous campaigning to strengthen national
labour legislation or its enforcement. Codes of conduct can be
no substitute for adequately enforced protection under national
law.
|