|
Fila's
Labour Abuses Continue!
Italian-born Fila, which has been unprofitable
over the last few years, is said to be making
a very good recovery following its US$ 350
million buy-out by privately owned US-based
Sport Brands International in July 2003.
SBI has instigated a vigorous overhaul of
Fila's global operations, seeking to maximise
brand-value, streamlining corporate structures,
and improving its supply-chain management.
Fila's new management strategy aims to reduce
delivery lead-times. Its sourcing centres
have been moved closer to production sites.
Most of its athletic apparel and footwear
is produced in the Far East - including
China, Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam, Cambodia,
and Malaysia.
Seeking to attract the younger consumer,
Fila is developing products that are more
fashion-orientated: a trend which demands
greater speed and flexibility from its manufacturers.
Pursuing an aggressive advertising campaign,
with a marketing budget of more than US$
70 million, Fila sponsors sports celebrities,
including tennis stars Jennifer Capriati
and Kim Clijsters, and US long-distance
runner Adam Goucher. A letter from Fila's
Manager for Brand Protection and Corporate
Compliance, dated 7 January 2004, states:
"Fila is dedicated to ensuring that
its products are manufactured under conditions
which reflect our commitment to human rights
in the workplace. We support internationally-recognised
norms for the safety and well-being of the
individuals who are responsible for the
manufacture of our products, and we believe
that it is incumbent upon the corporate
community, including ourselves, to ensure
that individuals' working environments around
the global meet or exceed these norms."
Although Fila has a Code of Business Conduct,
we have not been able to trace any information
on how the company actually implements its
code. Fila has not joined any multi-stakeholder
initiatives on labour standards. Evidence
on the ground suggests that the company
is far from meeting its ethical commitments.
Interviews with workers supplying Fila gave
these examples of abuse:
-
Workers made to do overtime until
midnight, without any advance warning,
before an export deadline. If they refused,
they were at risk of being dismissed.
-
Workers at one Chinese factory were
fined US$ 6 each for making flawed products.
-
Workers threatened with dismissal for
taking part in trade-union activities.
-
Workers ignorant of Fila's code of
conduct, despite the company's status
as a major customer of their factory.
Fila needs to make serious efforts to ensure
that its business operations do not lead
to the exploitation of workers in its supply-chain.
Simply having a code of conduct is not enough.
Fila should take immediate steps to collaborate
with its suppliers, to make the provisions
of its code an effective guarantee of the
rights of the workers who produce its goods.
The Tae Hwa case:
No
Response from FILA
July 2007,
For more than two years
the CCC has publicly called upon the US-sportswear
brand FILA to ensure proper compensation
for the women and men who lost their jobs
when FILA supplier PT Tae Hwa shut down
in 2005.To date FILA has failed to respond
to our requests for action in relation to
the closure of their Indonesian sports shoe
supplier.
More
info >>
|