From Athens to Beijing
- a Programme of Work for the Sportswear Industry
| The proposals below were developed
by the ICFTU, ITGLWF, Clean Clothes
Campaign and Oxfam as part of the Play
Fair at the Olympics campaign. They
were first presented to the ILO, the
WFSGI, several of its member companies
and other organisations at a consultation
organized by the ILO on may 25 2004.
The organizations supporting the Play
Fair at the Olympics campaign welcome
all feedback from industry and others.
(1)
|
1.
Substantially increase activities
that promote freedom of association and
collective bargaining, as well as participate
in international social dialogue.
1.1.
The
industry must take positive measures to
ensure that people performing work in this
industry have the right to form and join
trade unions of their own choosing and to
bargain collectively with their employers.
Such positive measures are particularly
important in situations where workers are
faced with oppression and can include:
-
Provision of clear guidance on what
is expected from suppliers concerning
compliance with the standards on FoA
and CBA, and what constitutes appropriate
consultative and representative mechanisms.
Such guidance shall be consistent with
the meaning of Freedom of Association
developed through ILO procedures.
-
Open communication of this policy to
national governments
-
Support for an facilitatation training
of management, workers and workers representatives
(separately and jointly) in freedom
of association, CBA and labour-management
relations. Such training should take
into account the gendered nature of
the workforce in this industry. Sourcing
companies should ensure the full commitment
of suppliers in these initiative.
- Providing paid time-off for worker representatives
to participate in exchanges with worker
representatives from other suppliers providing
the same brands.
1.2.
The industry should formally recognize,
and engage in dialogue with the organization
that represents workers performing work
in this industry at the global level by:
-
Entering into a formal agreement (framework
agreement) to be negotiated between
the ITGLWF and the WFSGI and its member
companies and signed by the ITGLWF and
the WFSGI and its member companies.
-
The purpose of the sectoral framework
agreement is to establish a mutual relationship,
which can facilitate freedom of association
and collective bargaining as the preferred
mechanism for implementing fundamental
employment rights and resolving labour
disputes in supplier factories in the
sector.
-
The sectoral framework agreement will
contain a set of standards, which represents
best practice from the industry and
which makes direct reference to internationally
recognized labour standards (ILO and
UN declaration of human rights). It
shall include all of the human rights
standards identified by the ILO as being
the fundamental rights at work PLUS
the right to a living wage based on
a regular working week that does not
exceed 48 hours, humane working hours
with no forced overtime, a safe and
healthy workplace free from harassment,
and in a recognized employment relationship
with labour and social protection.
-
It shall explicitly state that these
policies can not be used to weaken any
already existing protection for workers
established through law or practice
(for example by adding that when code
and law conflict, the company will follow
whichever offers the highest protection
to workers.
-
A key provision in the sectoral framework
agreement shall be access for the ITGLWF
to supplier locations of WFSGI member
firms for the purposes of facilitating
recognition of trade unions of the workers
choosing consistent with the principles
of freedom of association (2)
-
The ongoing negotiations
of a sectoral agreement shall in no
way prejudice present of future efforts
within member firms of the WFSGI to
meaningfully address the issues of freedom
of association and collective bargaining,
as outlined under 1.1 and, nor shall
it impede or replace any other efforts
taken by sportswear companies, individually
or collectively, as outlined under 2.1
and 2.2.
2.
Company-based and industry-wide action
and cooperation with relevant stakeholders
to ensure large-scale, credible and
effective code implementation:
2.1:
Not withstanding the succesfull negotiation
of a sectoral framework agreement, improve
and align code standards and compliance
programmes with best practice in the sector,
including:
-
Creating management systems to ensure
that managerial responsibility is assigned
appropriately in ensuring that suppliers
are aware of their responsibilities
in respecting all of the fundamental
rights that people have at work.
-
Creating the infrastructure to deal
with complaints by recognizing trade
unions and providing paid release for
trade union representatives to be trained
in resolving disputes over employment
rights, and developing confidential
and accessible means for workers to
report exploitation and abuse. Ensuring
timely and effective handling of complaints
regarding violations.
-
Mapping and investigating supply chains
and developing mechanisms to ensure
that the company knows where and under
what circumstances work is performed
throughout their supply chains.
-
Without prejudicing existing trade
unions representation working with credible
(local) organizations that have the
confidence of workers and their trade
unions to conduct, or assist in conducting,
social audits or workplace inspections;
-
Providing workers with independent
education and training concerning their
rights at work, and increasing workers
participation as well as consultation
and cooperation with local trade unions
and labour related NGOs in all activities
related to code implementation.
-
Undertaking concrete activities to
promote freedom of association, collective
bargaining and credible worker presentation
in line with 1.1.
-
Increasing transparency about the composition
and conditions in the supply chain and
about code implementation activities,
with priority on ensuring feedback to
the workers themselves.
-
Addressing the negative impacts that
their purchasing practices can have
on code compliance by developing more
stable relationships with suppliers,
providing sufficient lead times so that
production can be carried out using
humane working hours and by fully reflecting
the costs of observing labour standards
in the prices that they offer their
supplier or in the bids that they accept
from suppliers, and ensure that the
workers concerned actually benefit.
2.2.
Calling for a more active role for the ILO
in code implementation and verification
Beyond Geneva
-
Publicly and
practically support the programme as
outlined above
-
Seek to collaborate
with MSI s already working in the sportswear
sector, to increase synergy and to ensure
effective use of resources.
-
Promote attendance
at a regional consultation and planning
meeting in Asia in 2004, to be hosted
by the ILO, bringing together trade
unions, suppliers, sourcing companies
and labour-related NGOs
-
Support the demands
of the campaign towards the IOC, including
the insertion of a human rights clause
in the Olympic charter and the establishment
of a Commission to deal with ethical
labour practices along IOC garment supply
chains.
- The companies
and the WFSGI should provide an early
indication of their intentions with respect
to this programme of work. This could
be facilitated by the ILO.
notes
- Please contact Doug Miller
at the ITGLWF via dmiller@itglwf.org
or Ineke Zeldenrust at the Clean Clothes
Campaign via ineke@cleanclothes.org
- Including those not affiliated
to the ITGLWF.
|